Personal Profile

The esteemed attorney, Mr. Wang Yuelong, held the position of Professor in Civil and Commercial Law at the School of Law of East China University of Political Science and Law, and served as a mentor for master's students. In 1991, he obtained his license to practice law. Over an illustrious career spanning over three decades, he has successfully handled nearly one thousand civil and economic litigation cases, including non-litigation ones. His extensive portfolio encompasses all areas of civil and commercial law, especially in contract law, corporate law, real estate law, property law, tort law, etc. Given that most of the cases he handles are closely related to his academic discipline, he is able to comprehend and apply laws swiftly and accurately, thereby providing top-notch legal services, resulting in remarkable outcomes and consistently receiving high praise from clients. Furthermore, he possesses substantial practical experience in assisting clients with corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions, investment risk control, etc. For enterprise legal consultancy units, he can provide proactive legal consultation services and professional training tailored to their unique needs, earning him the utmost trust from these consultancy units.

Educational Background

• Master of Civil and Commercial Law, East China University of Political Science and Law

Professional Accomplishments

1. The renowned trademark dispute case between the Hangzhou Zhang Xiaoquan Knife Cutting Company and Shanghai Zhang Xiaoquan Knife Cutting Store, Zhang Xiaoquan Knife Cutting Manufacturing Company. As a matter of fact, Hangzhou Zhang Xiaoquan Company holds the prestigious "Zhang Xiaoquan" brand, demanding the Shanghai side to change its name. Esteemed supreme People's Court ruled against this request after the case was referred for judgment, making it an exemplary case published by the Supreme People's Court.
2. The equity dispute case between Shanghai Jianguo Resort and Shanghai Wumao Company. This case sparked off disputes due to the failure of shareholders to register their investment with the industry and commerce department. The question of how to determine shareholder status became the first instance in which the Shanghai High Court addressed the standard for company equity identification.
3. The equity transfer case of Shanghai Pudong Waterworks Company (non-litigation). This case marked the inaugural example of introducing foreign capital into public utilities through joint ventures in our country. All tender documents, evaluation criteria, contract content, etc., prepared by our firm have served as models in this field.
4. The construction dispute case involving nearly one hundred million yuan between Shanghai Wenren Entertainment Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Radio and Television Group Company over the renovation of old factories. The main issues involved were whether the renovation of the factory jointly developed by both parties was legal, who should bear the cost of construction funds, and whether the project quality met standards. The case concluded amicably between both parties.
5. The land development rights dispute case of Shanghai Jiangshan Land Development Company, triggered by longstanding issues during the development process such as changes in land development area, reapplication for changes in original architectural design, and outstanding payments from previous construction projects. Through a series of litigation and non-litigation activities, this project has now evolved into a high-end villa district in Pudong.
6. The insurance dispute case between Pacific Insurance Company Xi'an Branch and another company. This case was the first dispute arising out of the guarantee insurance product launched in our country's insurance industry, touching on the connection between guarantee relationship and insurance relationship, providing guidance for similar future cases.
7. The corporate personality denial case of Changcheng Broadband Network Service Shanghai Service Company. This was the first time that the provisions related to abuse of corporate personality in the Company Law were applied in Shanghai for trial, involving substantial evidence to prove the misuse of corporate personality.
8. The joint venture dispute case between Ningbo Ruirui Company and German partners. The case revolved around the ownership of land contributed by Chinese parties post expiration of the joint venture period. The focus of the case was on what constitutes company capital.
9. The equipment procurement dispute case between Italian TWTT Company and Foreign Trade Company. The case involved the responsibilities of foreign trade agents, users of equipment, and the determination of equipment acceptance and receipt, which is of great theoretical significance.
10. The dispute case between Shanghai Construction Engineering Group Company and Eastern Airlines subsidiary company over the settlement of engineering fees in the form of house purchases. The key issue here was whether the form of goods payment could be fulfilled and if it was the only method of debt repayment. After going through the first instance, second instance, and retrial, Shanghai Construction Engineering Group Company ultimately emerged victorious.